Skip to Content

Step 6 – Measure and monitor the right things

Step 6 – Measure and monitor the right things

Staying on track

A key aspect of the board’s stewardship responsibilities is to ensure the organisation’s performance is scrutinised and kept on track.

The board must monitor against pre-established criteria.

Unless the board establishes criteria for what it wants achieved, monitoring is likely to be disorganised, uninformed and unfair – leading to lost time, staff confusion, inefficiency and an adversarial board-chief executive relationship.

Monitoring should focus on outcomes or results, rather than how the outcomes are to be achieved. 

Monitoring versus evaluation

It is important to distinguish between monitoring and the process of evaluation.

Monitoring

Monitoring involves observing, recording and reporting information. It is retrospective. 

Evaluation

Evaluation is making a judgement, mainly to improve future performance. 

Board meetings should primarily be used to create the future, not rehash or review the past. 

Performance measures

Clear expectations need to precede performance measures.

Poorly expressed expectations will foster poor performance measures. The two main elements in establishing performance expectations are: 

  • desired outcomes: results to be achieved. 
  • planned actions: ways in which results will be achieved.

The board’s job is to specify what the organisation is to achieve. 

The chief executive determines the actions required. 

Common errors in creating performance agreements 

  • Reliance on feelings, instead of using demonstrated evidence 
  • Misuse of adjectives like ‘appropriate’ and ‘excellent’ that are imprecise 
  • Misuse of verbs like ‘promote’, ‘coordinate’ and ‘facilitate’ that direct attention to the action instead of the intended outcome 
  • Use of comparative words like ‘increase’, ‘improve’, and ‘more’ which need a fixed reference point 
  • Failure to be exact 
  • An unreasonable expectation, e.g. ‘ensure the government increases funding to the organisation’. 

Scanning the environment

Many boards are inclined to focus inwards and backwards instead of forwards and outwards.

Being strategic is not something that an effective board is, or does, occasionally. The external operating environment is constantly changing and the board needs to keep focused on the future.

Periodically the board needs to: 

  • check the organisation from the outside 
  • see what’s on the horizon 
  • define the main strategic challenges.

Supporting material

Communication and support to the board policy (DOC 184 KB) (in board charter)

Criterion-based monitoring (from Good Governance) (PDF 191 KB)

Discussion paper on decision-making (DOC 53.8 KB) (includes material on six thinking hats and other evaluation methods)

Performance measures: are they more trouble than they are worth? (PDF 128 KB)

Policy making: does your board put the cart before the horse? (PDF 146 KB)

Strategic and business planning (Sport NZ publication) (PDF 544 KB)

What is wrong with a typical risk register?

Download complete document

If you require an accessible version of any content on the site please contact us and we will be happy to assist.

Get Active
Find a sport or recreation activity
Browse Directory
Sport NZ
Who we are and what we do
ABOUT US
Funding
Information on funding
BROWSE FUNDING
Stay updated
Me whakahoutia

Sign up to our regular newsletters that connect Sport NZ to all those involved in the play, active recreation and sport sector.

burger close icon

Stay updated

Me whakahoutia

Keep up-to-date with news, events, and initiatives across the play, active recreation and sport sector.
No thanks